Occurrences

Date	Occurrence #	Location	State	Aircraft	Model	Engine	Model	Summary
15/8/2016	OCC0730	Unknown	SA	Foxcon Aviation	Terrier T200	Rotax	912 15	OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: An aircraft owner had a partial failure of the reduct...
OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: An aircraft owner had a partial failure of the reduction drive belt, in that about 15mm of the 60mm belt was shredded. In this instance it was fairly soon after a major service. The service had been done because the aircraft had just been purchased. During the repair it was discovered that the belt had never been at the correct tension. OUTCOME: Technical Manager reviewed this report and comments that this issue could be due to the design or poor maintenance. After review of previous reports RAAus have not identified any incidents of this kind previously. This type of reduction system is not widely used anymore. The Foxcon aircraft are a amateur built and do not conform to a known design standard. If another occurrence is logged in the OMS further suggested notifications to the membership will be considered.
15/8/2016	OCC0732	Moorabbin	VIC	Aeroprakt	Foxbat A22LS	Rotax	912 ULS	A student was sent for a solo circuit to be completed inside the Moorabbin airspace, which was succe...
A student was sent for a solo circuit to be completed inside the Moorabbin airspace, which was successfully completed. Upon landing the student took the bravo taxiway exit from RWY 35r. ATC asked the student to hold short of RWY35l. The student proceeded to cross the holding point of 35l. ATC asked the student to stop immediately as another aircraft was airborne on RWY35l. OUTCOME: Pilot was trained in CTA procedures, held a PPL and was undertaking a single solo circuit to confirm competence in CTA operations. The aircraft rolled through a taxiway threshold by one plane length and the aircraft on take off passed over head at 200 FT AGL. The pilot and Senior Instructor have been counselled and further assessment and retraining will be undertaken prior to further solo flight. CFI also holds weekly Instructor standards and safety meetings intended to raise awareness of these or other issues.
15/8/2016	OCC0731	Moruya Airport	NSW	Rutan	Varieze	Continental	O-200A	The pilot was flying to Moruya from Cooma to for unscheduled maintenance. About 15 NM from the Moruy...
The pilot was flying to Moruya from Cooma to for unscheduled maintenance. About 15 NM from the Moruya airfield the engine started missing beats. At about 10 NM from the airfield (having applied cold air induction) the aircraft started surging and at about 4-5 NM from the airfield the engine died. An attempt was made to restart the engine by closing the cold air induction, adding carburetor heat and changing fuel tanks (the aircraft has no starter). The pilot was within gliding distance of RWY36 and called their intentions and was acknowledged. The pilot lowered the nose wheel undercarriage, cut the corner of the circuit to clear hangars and completed a radical turn, close to the ground but safe, to line up on the airfield and landed safely. The pilot was then gripped by a thought that they had not lowered the undercarriage and (without confirming this thought) wound the undercarriage up whilst the canard wing was still working during the ground run. The canard wing eventually stalled and the nose dropped onto a rubber pad located on the retracted nose wheel leg. The rubber pad is sacrificial for wheel up landings. The rubber pad sheared and fuselage fiberglass and pitot tube were ground away. The pilot vacated the aircraft and pushed it off the airfield. OUTCOME: This aircraft was later inspected by a LAME / L2. The cause of the engine failure is believed to be due to the aircraft having a mud wasp nest (due to long period without use). They intend to strip the engine down. Subsequent nose gear leg being retracted was caused by the stress of the engine failure and the pad failing due to incorrect hardware (is observational as aircraft is an amateur built aircraft). Members are reminded to conduct pre-flight inspections and refer to the RAAus knowledge base regarding information on mud wasps https://facts.raa.asn.au/environmental/mud-wasps/
15/8/2016	OCC0796	Bald Hills	QLD	Tecnam	P92	Rotax	912 ULS	The pilot believed they were Class G airspace, however they were in Class C airspace without clearan...
The pilot believed they were Class G airspace, however they were in Class C airspace without clearance. The pilot was contacted by ATC who then apologised and descended into Class G and continued the flight with no further incident. OUTCOME: Due to similar landmarks in the vicinity (configuration of tower and major road), the pilot assessed he was clear of the CTA step lower limit. Pilots are reminded of the importance of using geographical features to assure of the aircraft location particularly when operating close to CTA boundaries.
14/8/2016	OCC0873	Canberra Airport	ACT	Brm Aero	Bristell LSA	Rotax	912 ULS	The aircraft landed long on RWY35 and had too much speed to exit via Charlie as directed. The pilot ...
The aircraft landed long on RWY35 and had too much speed to exit via Charlie as directed. The pilot felt that applying too much brake would possibly put the aircraft in a dangerous loop or skid so turned left after the Charlie intersection and joined Charlie from the next available exit, this being off RWY30. Thus expediting the aircraft exit from the RWY. OUTCOME: Pilot was instructed to vacate the runway by a specific taxiway by ATC, however due to landing late (and reluctance to brake heavily) the aircraft rolled past the taxiway and exited on the cross runway. Requirements for compliance with ATC instructions was understood by the pilot.
11/8/2016	OCC0772	NW of Brisbane	QLD	Evektor	Sportstar Plus	Rotax	912 ULS	Tracking direct from YRED to YKCY the pilot clipped the very edge of the 3500' step. The pilot was m...
Tracking direct from YRED to YKCY the pilot clipped the very edge of the 3500' step. The pilot was momentarily distracted by a question from the passenger and then mistook a ground landmark and started the climb to cruising altitude of 400' about 1 NM early. OUTCOME: Pilot in command lost situational awareness while navigating in close proximity to a known CTA boundary - contributing factors were distraction with passenger and inappropriate planning to provide sufficient buffers from control steps. Pilots are reminded to plan and manage generous separation from any CTA boundary and to maintain focus and attention on flight and navigation responsibilities whilst carrying passengers.
7/8/2016	OCC0722	Penfield	VIC	Skyfox Aviation	Gazelle Ca25n	Rotax	912A	Pre-flight: engine start and run-up normal with smooth running as per recommended operating procedur...
Pre-flight: engine start and run-up normal with smooth running as per recommended operating procedure. Upon reaching recommended oil temperature, engine run was conducted and aircraft systems deemed normal and operational. Upon advancing the throttle to full power on the commencement of the take off run, the engine ran rough and stopped quickly after approximately 2-3 seconds at full power. The PIC maintained control of the aircraft at all times and applied braking to come to a full stop on the runway. Shutdown procedure was conducted. Aircraft was subsequently pulled back to the hangar for investigation. OUTCOME: Technical Manager reviewed report. The aircraft was ground run after initial concerns with nil defects evident. LAME/ L2 maintainer could not identify issue and aircraft has been flown since with out further concerns. RAAus Technical Manager has advised that if any other issues arise in the future for the operator to submit a new notification.
7/8/2016	OCC0725	Goolwa Airport	SA	Luscombe	8E	Continental	C85-12F	Bird strike on propeller occurred during takeoff roll at approximately 20 kts. OUTCOME: Take-off w...
Bird strike on propeller occurred during takeoff roll at approximately 20 kts. OUTCOME: Take-off was aborted with no further incident. This is the first bird strike reported to RAAus at this area.
7/8/2016	OCC0727	Bendigo Aerodrome	VIC	Tecnam	P92 Super Echo LSA	Rotax	912 ULS	Aircraft 1 was on final approach to RWY 35, aircraft 2 turned on to right base leg after aircraft 1 ...
Aircraft 1 was on final approach to RWY 35, aircraft 2 turned on to right base leg after aircraft 1 had already turned on to final approach. Aircraft 2 appeared to be on a collision course to aircraft 1. The pilot had of aircraft 1 called aircraft 2 “we are on final you are cutting in front of us”. The pilot of aircraft 2 responded “sorry I thought you were the other aircraft” and turned away to the south. There was a third aircraft ahead of aircraft 1 at this stage on short final, and we had previously extended our downwind leg slightly to maintain separation. OUTCOME: The pilot of the Tecnam in this instance made an incorrect assumption of aircraft in the final approach phase and the reduced situational awareness and fixation on only this aircraft compromised the pilots' situational awareness of other possible threats. Pilots are reminded to apply active listening and good lookout to identify all threats to enhance "alerted see and avoid" principles at non-controlled aerodromes.
4/8/2016	OCC0729	Temora	NSW	Brumby	610R	Rotax	912 ULS	OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: During annual inspection on the left hand landing gea...
OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: During annual inspection on the left hand landing gear it was noted that there was a gap of approximately 1mm between the leg and the steel block which forms part of the outboard attachment to the fuselage. Upon further investigation it was found that the Nyloc nuts on the two 1/2 inch bolts were not sufficiently torqued to apply the correct clamping force on the leg. An inspection of the right hand gear found that the bolts could also be turned. Noting that the bolts are 1/2 inch, grade 8 high tensile steel, a gradual torqueing process was applied with a final torque of 80 lb ft to the bolts of both legs. OUTCOME: RAAus Technical Manager has reviewed the report. Error was identified during review / servicing and corrected.
2/8/2016	OCC0720	Bankstown Airport	NSW	Foxbat	A22LS	Rotax	912 ULS	The aircraft encountered a bird strike to the left hand side near the main wheel during the final st...
The aircraft encountered a bird strike to the left hand side near the main wheel during the final stage of landing for a touch and go. OUTCOME: Take-off was aborted and the aircraft taxied to the run up bay to inspect damage to the aircraft. No damage to the aircraft was reported. This is the first bird strike for Bankstown reported to RAAus.
31/7/2016	OCC0728	Raglan	QLD	Pacific Ibis	Ibis Magic	Rotax	912ULS	The daily inspection was completed as per the POH. The aircraft taxied to the Southern end of the ai...
The daily inspection was completed as per the POH. The aircraft taxied to the Southern end of the airstrip for a take off to the North. The pilot conducted the pre-takeoff checklist, engine run up etc. Completed an engine run-up for the second time and checked all the engine temperatures and pressures. The aircraft proceeded to take off and rotated at around 40kts and started to climb. The aircraft dramatically pitched up at a large angle of approximately 45 degrees. The aircraft stalled about 30-40 ft above the treetops. The left wing dropped and the pilot applied full right rudder. The left wing has impacted the treetops and subsequently impacted with terrain. OOUTCOME: The location was a private airstrip and the pilot had not flown the aircraft type before. Previous flights had been in a STOL type aircraft which used less runway to become airborne. The pilot was not a current RAAus Pilot Certificate holder and, due to unfamiliarity with the aircraft type, the aircraft stalled soon after take-off. Pilot has been required to complete his training for Pilot Certificate. Members are reminded of the importance of gaining experience in a new type with an experienced Instructor to ensure safe operations.
30/7/2016	OCC0741	Wellcamp Airport	QLD	Jabiru	J160	Jabiru	2200	Pilot experienced a loss of control on the runway upon landing. The aircraft nose wheel was not stra...
Pilot experienced a loss of control on the runway upon landing. The aircraft nose wheel was not straight upon touching down which lead to the nose wheel coming down too early. OUTCOME: The pilot in command was unable to control the aircraft throughout the flare and touchdown during the landing phase on two consecutive circuits which resulted in a loss of control of the aircraft. In the second instance the aircraft departed the runway and the aircraft came to rest with no determined damage. Primary Factor: The pilots use of aileron for primary directional control on the approach and lack of use of the rudder (to effectively overcome latent slipstream effect) during the flare were identified. Contributing factors included inexperience with bitumen runway operations and offset positioning on the approach (as briefed prior to arrival) and loss of situational awareness of yaw in the flare process. Member has conducted further training and education with local CFI.
27/7/2016	OCC0755	Gawler Airfield	SA	Jabiru	230	Jabiru	3300	Pilot was conducting a take off on RWY23 for a short local flight. Appropriate radio calls were give...
Pilot was conducting a take off on RWY23 for a short local flight. Appropriate radio calls were given on the Gawler CTAF advising of the aircraft taxing to the runway and takeoff roll on RWY 23. The pilot had been listening and watching for any aircraft in the circuit and was not aware of any however maintained a lookout. As the aircraft was in climb out, at about 1100ft AMSL (900ft AGL), they were about to turn crosswind when a glider was observed in the circuit area/crosswind soaring. The pilot of the aircraft continued the take off and climbed straight ahead before turning crosswind. At the same time the pilot radioed the glider to advise they had been seen and the actions taken. The gliders response was that they had heard the rolling call and knew the aircraft was coming, but at no stage did they advise they were there. OUTCOME: RAAus Operations Managers reviewed the report. For information CAR 166C does not require an aircraft to engage or respond to a broadcast call unless there is the risk of collision. In this case both pilots successfully separated their flight paths based on preferred visual methods.
24/7/2016	OCC0715	Moree	NSW	Jabiru	170C	Jabiru	2200	A student had completed the first part of a two stage solo flying assignment and was returning to th...
A student had completed the first part of a two stage solo flying assignment and was returning to the aerodrome from the training area. The weather conditions were ideal at the time (a high overcast sky and wind was calm). The student called inbound, followed by a call approaching the airfield. A second aircraft called inbound from the West for landing on RWY 01. The student responded that they were now overflying the airfield from the NW to join downwind for RWY 19. Now on base for RWY19, the student advised their position in the circuit and, on turning finals shortly after, confirmed to the Piper that they were planning a touch and go landing. The CFI became concerned that a conflict was developing (particularly knowing the student intended a touch and go landing) and attempted several times to call the second aircraft via a portable VHF (due to the aircrafts' short range) with the purpose of advising them of the solo student established for landing on RWY19 and posed a conflict with the RWY 01 approach (with no success). The student was slightly high on their approach, touching down at the 1500’ markers and in the roll out process, subsequently lost directional control of the aircraft whilst applying brake. The aircraft veered to the left and stopping about 15m outside the runway markers. No damage was done to the aircraft. After taxiing the aircraft back to the apron area, the remainder of the flight schedule was cancelled and the student debriefed. OUTCOME: The student pilot, under direct supervision, was involved in a runway excursion on landing. Contributing factors were GA aircraft failing to give way to existing aircraft in the circuit and failure to establish communications and ensure separation. RAAus actions: CFI advised to submit REPCON report of incident to CASA and provide further training to student pilot on missed approach, decision making and traffic conflict avoidance.