Date |
Occurrence # |
Location |
State |
Aircraft |
Model |
Engine |
Model |
Summary |
7/8/2016 |
OCC0722 |
Penfield |
VIC |
Skyfox Aviation |
Gazelle Ca25n |
Rotax |
912A |
Pre-flight: engine start and run-up normal with smooth running as per recommended operating procedur...
|
Pre-flight: engine start and run-up normal with smooth running as per recommended operating procedure. Upon reaching recommended oil temperature, engine run was conducted and aircraft systems deemed normal and operational. Upon advancing the throttle to full power on the commencement of the take off run, the engine ran rough and stopped quickly after approximately 2-3 seconds at full power. The PIC maintained control of the aircraft at all times and applied braking to come to a full stop on the runway. Shutdown procedure was conducted. Aircraft was subsequently pulled back to the hangar for investigation.
OUTCOME: Technical Manager reviewed report. The aircraft was ground run after initial concerns with nil defects evident. LAME/ L2 maintainer could not identify issue and aircraft has been flown since with out further concerns. RAAus Technical Manager has advised that if any other issues arise in the future for the operator to submit a new notification. |
7/8/2016 |
OCC0725 |
Goolwa Airport |
SA |
Luscombe |
8E |
Continental |
C85-12F |
Bird strike on propeller occurred during takeoff roll at approximately 20 kts.
OUTCOME: Take-off w...
|
Bird strike on propeller occurred during takeoff roll at approximately 20 kts.
OUTCOME: Take-off was aborted with no further incident. This is the first bird strike reported to RAAus at this area. |
7/8/2016 |
OCC0727 |
Bendigo Aerodrome |
VIC |
Tecnam |
P92 Super Echo LSA |
Rotax |
912 ULS |
Aircraft 1 was on final approach to RWY 35, aircraft 2 turned on to right base leg after aircraft 1 ...
|
Aircraft 1 was on final approach to RWY 35, aircraft 2 turned on to right base leg after aircraft 1 had already turned on to final approach. Aircraft 2 appeared to be on a collision course to aircraft 1. The pilot had of aircraft 1 called aircraft 2 “we are on final you are cutting in front of us”. The pilot of aircraft 2 responded “sorry I thought you were the other aircraft” and turned away to the south. There was a third aircraft ahead of aircraft 1 at this stage on short final, and we had previously extended our downwind leg slightly to maintain separation.
OUTCOME: The pilot of the Tecnam in this instance made an incorrect assumption of aircraft in the final approach phase and the reduced situational awareness and fixation on only this aircraft compromised the pilots' situational awareness of other possible threats. Pilots are reminded to apply active listening and good lookout to identify all threats to enhance "alerted see and avoid" principles at non-controlled aerodromes. |
4/8/2016 |
OCC0729 |
Temora |
NSW |
Brumby |
610R |
Rotax |
912 ULS |
OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: During annual inspection on the left hand landing gea...
|
OCCURRENCE DETAILS SUBMITTED TO RAAUS: DEFECT: During annual inspection on the left hand landing gear it was noted that there was a gap of approximately 1mm between the leg and the steel block which forms part of the outboard attachment to the fuselage. Upon further investigation it was found that the Nyloc nuts on the two 1/2 inch bolts were not sufficiently torqued to apply the correct clamping force on the leg. An inspection of the right hand gear found that the bolts could also be turned. Noting that the bolts are 1/2 inch, grade 8 high tensile steel, a gradual torqueing process was applied with a final torque of 80 lb ft to the bolts of both legs.
OUTCOME: RAAus Technical Manager has reviewed the report. Error was identified during review / servicing and corrected. |
2/8/2016 |
OCC0720 |
Bankstown Airport |
NSW |
Foxbat |
A22LS |
Rotax |
912 ULS |
The aircraft encountered a bird strike to the left hand side near the main wheel during the final st...
|
The aircraft encountered a bird strike to the left hand side near the main wheel during the final stage of landing for a touch and go.
OUTCOME: Take-off was aborted and the aircraft taxied to the run up bay to inspect damage to the aircraft. No damage to the aircraft was reported. This is the first bird strike for Bankstown reported to RAAus. |
31/7/2016 |
OCC0728 |
Raglan |
QLD |
Pacific Ibis |
Ibis Magic |
Rotax |
912ULS |
The daily inspection was completed as per the POH. The aircraft taxied to the Southern end of the ai...
|
The daily inspection was completed as per the POH. The aircraft taxied to the Southern end of the airstrip for a take off to the North. The pilot conducted the pre-takeoff checklist, engine run up etc. Completed an engine run-up for the second time and checked all the engine temperatures and pressures. The aircraft proceeded to take off and rotated at around 40kts and started to climb. The aircraft dramatically pitched up at a large angle of approximately 45 degrees. The aircraft stalled about 30-40 ft above the treetops. The left wing dropped and the pilot applied full right rudder. The left wing has impacted the treetops and subsequently impacted with terrain.
OOUTCOME: The location was a private airstrip and the pilot had not flown the aircraft type before. Previous flights had been in a STOL type aircraft which used less runway to become airborne. The pilot was not a current RAAus Pilot Certificate holder and, due to unfamiliarity with the aircraft type, the aircraft stalled soon after take-off. Pilot has been required to complete his training for Pilot Certificate. Members are reminded of the importance of gaining experience in a new type with an experienced Instructor to ensure safe operations. |
30/7/2016 |
OCC0741 |
Wellcamp Airport |
QLD |
Jabiru |
J160 |
Jabiru |
2200 |
Pilot experienced a loss of control on the runway upon landing. The aircraft nose wheel was not stra...
|
Pilot experienced a loss of control on the runway upon landing. The aircraft nose wheel was not straight upon touching down which lead to the nose wheel coming down too early.
OUTCOME: The pilot in command was unable to control the aircraft throughout the flare and touchdown during the landing phase on two consecutive circuits which resulted in a loss of control of the aircraft. In the second instance the aircraft departed the runway and the aircraft came to rest with no determined damage.
Primary Factor: The pilots use of aileron for primary directional control on the approach and lack of use of the rudder (to effectively overcome latent slipstream effect) during the flare were identified. Contributing factors included inexperience with bitumen runway operations and offset positioning on the approach (as briefed prior to arrival) and loss of situational awareness of yaw in the flare process. Member has conducted further training and education with local CFI. |
27/7/2016 |
OCC0755 |
Gawler Airfield |
SA |
Jabiru |
230 |
Jabiru |
3300 |
Pilot was conducting a take off on RWY23 for a short local flight. Appropriate radio calls were give...
|
Pilot was conducting a take off on RWY23 for a short local flight. Appropriate radio calls were given on the Gawler CTAF advising of the aircraft taxing to the runway and takeoff roll on RWY 23. The pilot had been listening and watching for any aircraft in the circuit and was not aware of any however maintained a lookout. As the aircraft was in climb out, at about 1100ft AMSL (900ft AGL), they were about to turn crosswind when a glider was observed in the circuit area/crosswind soaring. The pilot of the aircraft continued the take off and climbed straight ahead before turning crosswind. At the same time the pilot radioed the glider to advise they had been seen and the actions taken. The gliders response was that they had heard the rolling call and knew the aircraft was coming, but at no stage did they advise they were there.
OUTCOME: RAAus Operations Managers reviewed the report. For information CAR 166C does not require an aircraft to engage or respond to a broadcast call unless there is the risk of collision. In this case both pilots successfully separated their flight paths based on preferred visual methods. |
24/7/2016 |
OCC0715 |
Moree |
NSW |
Jabiru |
170C |
Jabiru |
2200 |
A student had completed the first part of a two stage solo flying assignment and was returning to th...
|
A student had completed the first part of a two stage solo flying assignment and was returning to the aerodrome from the training area. The weather conditions were ideal at the time (a high overcast sky and wind was calm). The student called inbound, followed by a call approaching the airfield. A second aircraft called inbound from the West for landing on RWY 01. The student responded that they were now overflying the airfield from the NW to join downwind for RWY 19. Now on base for RWY19, the student advised their position in the circuit and, on turning finals shortly after, confirmed to the Piper that they were planning a touch and go landing. The CFI became concerned that a conflict was developing (particularly knowing the student intended a touch and go landing) and attempted several times to call the second aircraft via a portable VHF (due to the aircrafts' short range) with the purpose of advising them of the solo student established for landing on RWY19 and posed a conflict with the RWY 01 approach (with no success). The student was slightly high on their approach, touching down at the 1500’ markers and in the roll out process, subsequently lost directional control of the aircraft whilst applying brake. The aircraft veered to the left and stopping about 15m outside the runway markers. No damage was done to the aircraft. After taxiing the aircraft back to the apron area, the remainder of the flight schedule was cancelled and the student debriefed.
OUTCOME: The student pilot, under direct supervision, was involved in a runway excursion on landing. Contributing factors were GA aircraft failing to give way to existing aircraft in the circuit and failure to establish communications and ensure separation. RAAus actions: CFI advised to submit REPCON report of incident to CASA and provide further training to student pilot on missed approach, decision making and traffic conflict avoidance. |
24/7/2016 |
OCC0713 |
Private strip, Busselton |
WA |
Fantasy Air |
Allegro |
Rotax |
912 ULS |
After landing, while taxiing the right main wheel dropped into a mud hole at turning point pulling p...
|
After landing, while taxiing the right main wheel dropped into a mud hole at turning point pulling plane sharply to the right damaging nose wheel yoke.
OUTCOME: The reporter stated that there was heavy rain on the runway the week prior and suggested avoidance of the runway until such time the wet conditions had dried. Operations have reviewed the report with no further action required. |
19/7/2016 |
OCC0708 |
Cessnock |
NSW |
Aeroprakt |
A22ls |
Rotax |
ULS |
During a Nav exercise the student made a call at 10 NM to which no response was heard for inbound fo...
|
During a Nav exercise the student made a call at 10 NM to which no response was heard for inbound for circuits. The student followed correct procedure and checked the pattern for traffic and traffic was seen on the final for RWY 35. The student elected to join a cross wind and tried to make contact with the aircraft in the circuit however no response was heard. The student then made a general broadcast that they were joining cross wind. The second aircraft turned towards the student aircraft - when they got to around 200m the student took evasive action and joined up wind.
OUTCOME: An air proximity event developed involving an aircraft joining circuit at Cessnock aerodrome with an aircraft established in circuit operations. The pilot of the joining aircraft took appropriate evasive action to avoid collision. Operations at non-controlled aerodromes present environments of high risk for aircraft in close proximity. The use of radio, while sometimes effective in providing "alerted see and avoid", should not be relied on for determination of circuit traffic or positioning. Pilots are reminded to apply effective lookout and appropriate circuit joining practices to minimise potential for collisions. |
19/7/2016 |
OCC0724 |
Cessnock |
NSW |
Tecnam |
Sierra |
Rotax |
912 S 2 |
This report was submitted as the other pilot in command involved in an aircraft separation incident ...
|
This report was submitted as the other pilot in command involved in an aircraft separation incident at Cessnock. The pilot was not aware of any incident however was aware of a Foxbat joining the circuit during the period that they were conducting practice crosswind landings on RWY 35. The pilot had carried out six standard LH circuits on RWY 35 and towards the end of the session heard an aircraft make a 10nm inbound call however no information was requested and as such the pilot saw no reason to respond. On the downwind leg of the second last circuit the pilot cited the inbound aircraft on the dead side of the runway. Initially the pilot thought that the aircraft was a Gazelle but at that point, the aircraft gave a joining circuit call identifying itself as a Foxbat (also confirmed visual). The pilot then lost sight of the aircraft and assumed that it had taken its place in the circuit behind them which was confirmed when the pilot heard its base call as their aircraft was on final.
OUTCOME: An air proximity event developed involving an aircraft joining circuit at Cessnock aerodrome with an aircraft established in circuit operations. The pilot of the joining aircraft took appropriate evasive action to avoid collision. Operations at non-controlled aerodromes present environments of high risk for aircraft in close proximity. The use of radio, while sometimes effective in providing "alerted see and avoid", should not be relied on for determination of circuit traffic or positioning. Pilots are reminded to apply effective lookout and appropriate circuit joining practices to minimise potential for collisions. |
17/7/2016 |
OCC0717 |
Fort Courage |
NSW |
Jabiru |
J120c |
Jabiru |
2200B |
The pilot and passenger were 8 nm from their destination of Wentworth and were conducting a circuit ...
|
The pilot and passenger were 8 nm from their destination of Wentworth and were conducting a circuit over Fort Courage at 2200ft when an unknown aircraft was noticed overhead within a very close proximity to them. The pilot continued the circuit and then continued to Wentworth.
OUTCOME: Pilots are reminded to maintain good situational awareness through effective scanning and where possible fly at published hemispherical headings even below 5000 AMSL. |
17/7/2016 |
OCC0710 |
Wudinna |
SA |
Jabiru |
J230-D |
Jabiru |
3300-A |
At about 1730 local time the pilot was landing in a paddock on private property and flew into a Mall...
|
At about 1730 local time the pilot was landing in a paddock on private property and flew into a Mallee tree. The pilot had already completed a low pass to confirm where they would land, however landing into the sun distorted their perception of height.
OUTCOME: Loss of control event on landing due to environmental factors. |
16/7/2016 |
OCC0706 |
Dapto |
NSW |
Foxbat |
A22LS Amphibian |
Rotax |
912ULS |
An amphibian aircraft landed in Lake Illawarra with one port side main wheel not fully retracted.
O...
|
An amphibian aircraft landed in Lake Illawarra with one port side main wheel not fully retracted.
OUTCOME: Technical Manager reviewed the report. It was identified that a small stick had punctured the air line for the undercarriage in the floats. The pilot conducted an emergency landing without any major issues. After the incident the owner spoke with the factory and was able to modify the area of concern and no further issues to date. |